Do entry valuations really matter when the market is so bullish!

If you are an angel investor and are keen to participate in Africa’s boom in the Startups space, you must wonder how startups are valued. Based on data from Africa: The Big Deal, it has taken just 7 weeks for African startups to raise their first USD 1bln in 2022, and in some instances, with valuations, we have not seen before! For context, the total funding raised by the ecosystem in 2019, just 3 years ago, was USD 1.3bln!

Assuming you are already convinced that there is something here, the next question is which startup should you invest in and under what terms. The key term you are probably wondering about is the ‘V’ -word, Valuation! One of the questions I am asked most often is how do you value a startup? How can you tell that the valuation is correct? My answer, I really do not know and am not even sure it’s a question that can be answered. There are several methods  used to value startups; if this is what you are looking for, unfortunately, this blog will not answer your question. However, this piece will help you decide if the deal at hand makes sense from an expected return perspective.

Public companies are valued. Private companies are priced! I did not coin this phrase. I do not know who did, but credit to one of the leading early-stage investors in the African ecosystem Eghosa of Echo VC, for bringing it to my attention. Once this statement sinks in, you will see the valuation of startups in a different light. For me, it boils down to a few points:

  1. On day one, startups are not selling you anything tangible. They are selling you the future! As you probably know, thanks to Covid for the lesson, the future is the future.
  2. You should look to get a sense of what the startup’s value will be in the future, but remember, what you are really asking is whether, with the information available, team, market, competitive advantage, level of traction, etc. do the proposed terms make sense?
  3. This being the case, what you can do during the early days is not to value but rather to price.
  4. When pricing services or goods, two things are essential: the cost and the margin. In ‘valuing’ startups, the margin is the margin of error!
  5. If it is too high, you overpay and may end up with a down round in future and not meeting your returns. If it’s just right, you may be in for some decent returns!
  6. With the different investors who follow you, the VCs, PEs and even strategics, the pricing needs to be just right to ensure that there is enough value that you can keep and sufficient value remaining for subsequent players. Otherwise, they will not invest, and if they do, the exit may never happen.

What then is the right question to ask? I think the question should be, should I invest with the terms on the table and with my return expectations/target? The VCs have thought about the problem and have developed systematic ways to answer this question.

The good part is that luckily for you, we have developed a tool that will help you to use this method to find out if you should be investing based on the terms provided to you by a startup. The bad part is that it will require some heavy lifting. The tool helps you think about the startup’s pricing the deal terms and ask what kind of returns you should expect under different scenarios. One of the key due diligence (DD) aspects every investor should carry out, assuming everything else checks out, is the deal terms DD! Here you ask, is this good business a good investment?

Let us make this tangible ; in 2020, amidst the chaos and suffering Covid caused, one story that made me smile was Paystacks acquisition by Stripe for USD 200 million (mio). At the time, we had not seen all the billions currently getting raised and this acquisition had the same impact as Flutterwave’s USD 3bln valuation.

Let us assume that you were an angel in this deal and that you invested USD 10,000 at a valuation of USD 1,000,000. From various case studies, we know that the company did not raise many rounds of funding, but let us assume that your exit happens at Series B for our illustration. Let us also assume that they had raised a Pre-seed, Seed, Series A, and finally, you exited at Series B by this time. That would mean you invested in the first round and there were two other rounds before your exit Let us also assume that you did not participate in subsequent rounds of investing as a new angel, which means that after your initial USD 10k investment, you did not invest in any of the other rounds. This means you were diluted in each of these subsequent rounds but thank God at higher valuations as the exit would show.

For ease in calculations, let us assume that Paystack took the following path to exit (which is achievable, a pricing lift of 5 – 10x between different rounds). Let us also assume that each round happened after 12 months with 10 – 15% dilutions per round.

  1. Seed – USD 10 mio
  2. Series A – USD 50 mio
  3. Series B – USD 200 mio

With this in mind, we can determine the kind of returns you would have gotten at the exit, but that is not the fun part. The interesting part is asking yourself what kind of returns you would have posted had the entry valuation been different. We assume a pre-seed post-money valuation range for this blog starting from USD 1 mio – USD 25 mio.

The table below summarizes the return scenarios.

 

A few key takeout’s from these return numbers:

  1. In each of these scenarios, you make a good return, 7.7X is not bad by any standards, of course, 153X is much better 😀
  2. While no one knows what the right ‘valuation’ is, overpaying for a startup at entry will surely cost you more than the icing on the cake!
  3. If you had gotten in at USD 1mio this return alone would probably make up for any other investments you had done, whatever their outcome. At USD 20 mio you would surely need your other portfolio companies to post a good return

Conclusion: valuation, pricing or whatever you want to call it matters. Amid this frothy valuations market, do your analysis, not only on the company but most importantly, on the deal!

Financial Model Review FAQs

Have you ever developed a financial model for a client or your organization and later found out that the spreadsheet had errors? What did you do? Did you go to your supervisor or the client and tell them …?

Person 1: “Oh, by the way, do you know the model we built for Project Y had some minor mistakes, but it’s nothing to worry about” or

Person 2: “I would like to bring to your attention that I found some mistakes in the model we built for Project Y. I have assessed the potential financial impact of the mistake and would like to bring you up to speed and brainstorm some possible remedies at the earliest possible opportunity” or

Person 3: Are you the type that ignored it and hoped that nobody would ever find out? In this scenario, I’m right on the money that you dreaded hearing these words from your supervisor, “please come to my office and close the door or from the client, “Something’s not adding up. We need to talk.

Whoever you are, these costly mistakes can be minimized by getting someone else to review and audit your model.

This article will answer some Frequently Asked Questions on financial model review and why it is important for anyone making financial and non-financial decisions to ensure their financial model has been reviewed before adoption. This article is NOT about financial model audit.

What is a financial model?

A financial model is a forward-looking abstract representation of real-world financial situations for use in decision making. Financial models can be built for businesses, projects, and portfolio of assets, among other uses. A financial model is built in spreadsheet software such as Excel.

Why should you review your financial model before adoption?

According to Ruth McKeever, around 95% of spreadsheets contain actual or potential errors. Isn’t this enough reason to review your model?

What are some common mistakes found in financial models?

Common mistakes may be categorized as below:

  1. Integrity errors – these arise from inconsistencies with accounting, tax, and business principles.
  2. Logical errors – these come from inconsistent operational, financial, and economic assumptions made in the model.
  3. Model build errors – these are errors that interfere with the flexibility, transparency, and structure of the model.
  4. Subject matter knowledge – these errors occur when the modeller lacks knowledge around specific calculations that affect the correctness of the output.

How can a modeller minimize mistakes in financial models?

  1. Understanding the task at hand and developing a conceptual model before starting the model build.
  2. Using a financial model standard. At InVhestia, we use the FAST Standard.
  3. Conducting sufficient research in the field of the business or project being modelled.
  4. Using checks and alerts in the financial model.
  5. Conducting a financial model review – this is a review of a financial model which provides added confidence to users about the financial model. Comprehensive model reviews will identify errors, so they can be corrected.
  6. Conducting a full financial model audit – this is a cell-by-cell review of a financial model to give full confidence in the reliance on the financial model. It checks the assumptions made, flow of data and calculation blocks, model structure, logical thinking, adherence to accounting and tax rules, and presence of external links, among other checks.

What is the difference between financial model review and financial model audit?

Financial model review is a process that focuses on certain aspects of the model (such as formula inconsistency, external links, hardcoding in calculations) as per agreed terms with the model owner while a financial model audit is a cell-by-cell review of the financial model and encompasses conducting logical, integrity, model build, and commercial checks. A model audit often takes longer than a model review because it is a more detailed exercise.

What are some similarities between financial model review and financial model audit?

  1. Both result in a report that can be used to correct the errors identified in the model.
  2. Both increase the level of confidence for users using the model.
  3. Both require an understanding of financial modelling to complete successfully.
  4. Both can be done manually or using a software or a mix of both.

How can a modeller conduct a financial model review?

A modeller can do a quick financial model review by:

  1. Reviewing the logic and integrity of the model and checking whether the calculations are reasonable and consistent with the operational, financial, and economic assumptions contained in the model.
  2. Reviewing whether the composition of key financial indicators is reasonable in the model.
  3. Reviewing formulas in key calculation blocks.
  4. Creating error checks and alerts for key items such as balance sheet and cashflow statement.
  5. Checking whether the model follows all accounting rules, tax, and business principles.
  6. Using Excel functions such as trace dependents and precedents, Ctrl+\, error checking, show formulas, among other functions.
  7. Stress testing to check whether the output is consistent with the expected changes after changing key assumptions.

Who needs financial model review services?

  1. Small and medium-sized businesses
  2. Private equity and venture capital firms
  3. Startups
  4. Multinational companies
  5. Project companies
  6. Governments
  7. Institutions such as banks, NGOs, learning institutions, DFIs etc

In conclusion, it is advisable to review your financial models to avoid making costly financial and non-financial mistakes. Remember, as Stephen Gugu, Principal at InVhestia Africa, says, “there is no Excel money. Any mistake in a financial model leads to a loss in real money.”

InVhestia Africa has built capabilities around financial model review over the years. We would be delighted to help you increase the confidence level in your financial model before making any financial or non-financial decisions. Please check our website for more information on the financial model review product.

 

Written by Keziah Njeri, Associate Principal, InVhestia Africa Limited.